DOJ-OGR-00019135.jpg
601 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
601 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Prosecutor Ms. Moe argues for the use of a summary witness to review exhibits without discussing investigative steps. The Judge ('The Court') rejects this characterization, stating that the proposed testimony does not fit Federal Rule of Evidence 1006 and appears to be an improper 'mini closing argument' presented through a witness.
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by Southern District Reporters
|
Key Quotes (3)
"The purpose here isn't to have the summary witness talk through the investigation or investigative steps, but to talk about a review of exhibits."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019135.jpg
Quote #1
"you're providing essentially a closing argument or mini closing argument via a witness who has no personal involvement in the investigation"Source
DOJ-OGR-00019135.jpg
Quote #2
"But I can't say I've ever seen a version like this."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019135.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document