DOJ-OGR-00020845.jpg

539 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 539 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 22-1426) dated February 28, 2023. It details a discussion between the Judge ('The Court') and defense attorneys (Menninger, Sternheim, Everdell) regarding how to answer an ambiguous jury question related to 'Count Four' and 'Element 2'. The defense argues that without evidence of intent for sexual activity on a return flight, the jury cannot convict.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Ms. Menninger Defense Counsel
Arguing about jury instructions regarding 'Count Four' and 'purpose of travel'.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the discussion regarding a jury question.
Mr. Everdell Defense Counsel
Referenced by Menninger; speaks later raising a procedural issue regarding a note.
Ms. Sternheim Defense Counsel
Requests a moment to confer with counsel.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
DOJ
Inferred from footer stamp 'DOJ-OGR-00020845'

Timeline (1 events)

Unknown
Court proceedings discussing jury instructions and a question from the jury regarding Count Four.
Courtroom

Locations (1)

Location Context
Likely SDNY (New York), inferred from reporter name.

Relationships (2)

Ms. Menninger Co-Counsel Mr. Everdell
Menninger references Everdell's previous statement; they appear to be on the same legal team.
Ms. Sternheim Co-Counsel Mr. Everdell
Sternheim asks for time, followed by 'Counsel conferred', followed by Everdell speaking.

Key Quotes (3)

"If they don't have evidence that the intent on the return flight was for purposes of sexual activity, then I do think the answer... is, no, they can't convict."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020845.jpg
Quote #1
"I don't know if what they have in mind is an aiding and abetting question"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020845.jpg
Quote #2
"The photograph on the phone keeps disappearing."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020845.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document