DOJ-OGR-00002389(1).jpg
648 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing (draft/redlined protective order)
File Size:
648 KB
Summary
This is page 12 of a legal filing (Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS, Giuffre v. Maxwell) filed on March 4, 2016. It outlines the procedures for challenging 'Confidential' or 'Highly Confidential' designations of discovery material. It specifies that failing to challenge a designation immediately does not waive the right to do so later, and outlines a process requiring written notice and potential court hearings to resolve disputes over these designations.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| RWS | Judge |
Judge Robert W. Sweet (implied by case number in header)
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Indicated by footer stamp DOJ-OGR-00002389
|
|
| The Court |
Venue for hearings regarding designation disputes
|
Relationships (1)
Producing Party
→
Legal Opponents/Counterparties
→
Receiving Party
Protocol for objecting to material designations between parties.
Key Quotes (3)
"the party designating the information as CONFIDENTIAL shall bear the burden of establishing that good cause exists for the disputed information to be treated as CONFIDENTIAL."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002389(1).jpg
Quote #1
"failure to challenge the designation of any Discovery Material... shall not in any way constitute an admission that such material contains any competitively sensitive information"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002389(1).jpg
Quote #2
"The Parties will use their best efforts to resolve such objections among themselves."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002389(1).jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document