DOJ-OGR-00009065.jpg
413 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing / legal motion (motion for new trial)
File Size:
413 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated January 19, 2022, arguing that Ms. Maxwell's guilty verdict should be vacated. The text alleges that Juror No. 50 and at least one other juror were dishonest during the *voir dire* process, violating the defendant's Constitutional right to a fair and impartial jury. The defense requests a new trial or, alternatively, an evidentiary hearing to examine all twelve jurors.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the trial; arguing for a new trial based on juror misconduct.
|
| Juror No. 50 | Juror |
Accused of dishonesty during voir dire and failing to honor obligations.
|
| Unnamed Juror | Juror |
Referenced as 'at least one other juror' who allegedly did not give truthful answers.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court |
Implied by 'this Court' and the case header format.
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Indicated by the Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
Timeline (2 events)
January 19, 2022
Submission of legal motion arguing for a new trial.
Court
Ms. Maxwell's defense team
Relationships (1)
Maxwell claims Juror No. 50 was dishonest, denying her a fair trial.
Key Quotes (3)
"For its part, this Court expressed “confidence” that its voir dire process would “smoke out” a juror who was dishonest."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009065.jpg
Quote #1
"Unfortunately, we now know that Juror No. 50 (and at least one other juror) did not honor their obligations to give “only truthful answers.”"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009065.jpg
Quote #2
"Because Ms. Maxwell’s jury was not the fair and impartial one guaranteed her by the United States Constitution, this Court should vacate the jury’s verdict and order a new trial."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009065.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document