DOJ-OGR-00009270.jpg
994 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (redirect examination)
File Size:
994 KB
Summary
This document is a transcript from the case 'United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas' dated February 15, 2012, filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It features the redirect examination of a witness, Ms. Conrad (a former juror), who is being aggressively questioned about her failure to follow Judge Pauley's instructions and her admission of perjury during voir dire. The document is likely included in the Maxwell case files as a legal precedent regarding juror misconduct and the impact of untruthful answers during jury selection.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Conrad | Witness/Juror |
Being questioned about her conduct as a juror, specifically regarding perjury during voir dire and following judge's ...
|
| Paul M. Daugerdas | Defendant |
Named in the case caption (United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas).
|
| Judge Pauley | Judge |
The judge who gave instructions during the trial in question.
|
| Mr. Okula | Attorney |
Mentioned as having asked previous questions; raises objections during this examination.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding judge over the current hearing (rules on objections).
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States of America |
Plaintiff in the case caption.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters |
Court reporting agency listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by DOJ-OGR stamp).
|
Timeline (1 events)
2012-02-15
Court hearing involving the redirect examination of Ms. Conrad regarding juror misconduct.
Southern District Court
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Likely Southern District of New York (SDNY), based on reporters and case context.
|
Relationships (1)
Conrad discusses following (or failing to follow) Judge Pauley's instructions.
Key Quotes (4)
"Q. You know for a fact you didn't follow all those instructions, don't you? A. No, I don't think that's correct."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009270.jpg
Quote #1
"Q. Taking into account the fact that you perjured yourself repeatedly at voir dire, did you follow all of his instructions?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009270.jpg
Quote #2
"A. I didn't follow the instructions in voir dire."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009270.jpg
Quote #3
"Q. In your opinion, Ms. Conrad, did your perjury in voir dire affect your ability to act as a fair and impartial juror? A. No, not at all."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009270.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document