DOJ-OGR-00000057.tif
42.4 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document (court filing or legal analysis)
File Size:
42.4 KB
Summary
This document is a legal analysis discussing principles of statutory interpretation, particularly concerning the meaning of 'United States' in plea agreements. It details how language placement in a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) informs intent, specifically noting how a co-conspirator immunity clause was severed from Epstein's immunity clause and how the NPA's terms may preclude Maxwell's prosecution.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Williams | Party in a legal case |
Cited in Williams, 102 F.3d at 927
|
| Margalli-Olvera | Party in a legal case |
Cited in Margalli-Olvera, 43 F.3d at 352
|
| Rubbo | Party in a legal case |
Cited in United States v. Rubbo, 396 F.3d 1330, 1334 (11th Cir. 2005)
|
| Antonin Scalia | Author |
Co-author of Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
|
| Bryan A. Garner | Author |
Co-author of Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
|
| Epstein | Individual central to the NPA negotiations |
Epstein's immunity clause, Epstein's restrictive language
|
| Maxwell | Individual subject to potential prosecution |
NPA precludes Maxwell's prosecution
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| DOJ-OGR |
Document identifier prefix
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Referred to as a country and a geographic area, relevant to jurisdiction
|
Relationships (2)
co-conspirator immunity clause was severed from Epstein's immunity clause; co-conspirator clause subsequently severed from Epstein's restrictive language
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document