EFTA00011496.pdf
135 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order
File Size:
135 KB
Summary
A court order from the Southern District of New York dated June 16, 2021, in the case of Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke, et al. Judge John G. Koeltl orders the plaintiff to pay $13.70 in costs to defendant Ghislane Maxwell, affirming Maxwell as a prevailing party after the plaintiff dismissed the action against her with prejudice.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane Doe | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in the civil case against Indyke and others.
|
| Darren K. Indyke | Defendant |
Named defendant in the case caption.
|
| Ghislane Maxwell | Defendant |
Defendant seeking to have costs of $13.70 taxed against the plaintiff; declared a prevailing party by the court.
|
| John G. Koeltl | District Judge |
Judge issuing the order.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of New York |
Venue of the legal action.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2021-06-16
Order issued by Judge John G. Koeltl requiring Plaintiff to pay $13.70 in costs to Ghislane Maxwell.
New York, New York
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where the order was signed/issued.
|
Relationships (2)
Plaintiff dismissed action with prejudice against Ms. Maxwell; ordered to pay costs to Maxwell.
Case caption: Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke, et al.
Key Quotes (3)
"Defendant, Ghislane Maxwell, seeks to have her costs in the amount of $13.70 taxed against the plaintiff"Source
EFTA00011496.pdf
Quote #1
"This Court previously found that Ms. Maxwell was a prevailing party."Source
EFTA00011496.pdf
Quote #2
"Because Ms. Maxwell is the prevailing party, the plaintiff should pay the costs in the amount of $13.70."Source
EFTA00011496.pdf
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document