DOJ-OGR-00010173.jpg

464 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

5
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 464 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (filed Aug 24, 2022) recording an argument by Ms. Davis (prosecution) against a motion for a new trial for defendant Mr. Parse. Davis argues that Parse received a 'platinum plated defense' and that his previous counsel (Brune & Richard) made a strategic decision to keep Catherine Conrad as Juror No. 1 despite knowing her identity, a choice that resulted in acquittals on some counts. The text discusses the 'Strickland standard' for ineffective assistance of counsel.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Ms. Davis Attorney (likely Prosecution)
Speaker arguing against the motion for a new trial, asserting the defendant received a 'platinum plated defense'.
Mr. Shechtman Attorney (Defense)
Attorney representing Mr. Parse, arguing for ineffective assistance of counsel.
Mr. Parse Defendant
The defendant seeking a new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel.
Catherine Conrad Attorney/Juror
An individual identified as both an attorney and 'Juror No. 1', central to the legal argument regarding juror miscond...
Juror No. 1 Juror
Identified as being the same person as Catherine Conrad.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Brune & Richard
Law firm representing Mr. Parse during the trial; accused of knowing Catherine Conrad was a juror and gambling on the...
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Court reporting service.
DOJ
Department of Justice (inferred from footer DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (2 events)

2022-08-24
Court proceedings regarding Case 1:20-cr-00339-AJN
Courtroom (Southern District)
Prior to 2022-08-24
Trial of Mr. Parse
Courtroom
Mr. Parse Brune & Richard Law Firm Catherine Conrad (Juror No. 1)

Locations (1)

Location Context
Jurisdiction of the court (likely SDNY based on reporter info).

Relationships (3)

Mr. Parse Attorney-Client Mr. Shechtman
Mr. Shechtman is arguing on behalf of Mr. Parse.
Catherine Conrad Same Person Juror No. 1
Text states 'Catherine Conrad and Juror No. 1 were the same person'.
Mr. Parse Former Counsel Brune & Richard
Text refers to the law firm making strategic choices for Parse during the trial.

Key Quotes (3)

"Mr. Parse did in fact receive what can only be described as a platinum plated defense with a defense team that most defendants can only dream of."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010173.jpg
Quote #1
"Brune & Richard law firm knew that Catherine Conrad and Juror No. 1 were the same person and chose to gamble with the jury that"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010173.jpg
Quote #2
"Mr. Shechtman has met neither prong of the Strickland standard in that he cannot show ineffective assistance of counsel and he cannot show prejudice."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010173.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document