DOJ-OGR-00020373.jpg
598 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal court document (appellate filing/opinion)
File Size:
598 KB
Summary
This page from a legal filing (Case 21-58) discusses the court's affirmation of Judge Nathan's decision to deny Ghislaine Maxwell bail. The text argues that MDC's nighttime security protocols do not interfere with Maxwell's trial preparation and notes procedural errors in Maxwell's filing of a 'renewed motion' rather than a new appeal or proper motion in District Court. It cites Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure regarding the untimeliness of the motion.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | Defendant/Appellant |
Subject of bail hearings; applying for pretrial release; currently detained at MDC.
|
| Judge Nathan | District Court Judge |
Made the lower court determinations denying Maxwell's bail; ruled on MDC security protocols.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MDC |
Metropolitan Detention Center; facility where Maxwell is detained; mentioned regarding nighttime security protocols.
|
|
| 2d Cir. |
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit; the court referenced in the case citation and likely the court...
|
|
| District Court |
The lower court where Judge Nathan presides and where motions must be filed.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by footer stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
Timeline (2 events)
Prior to 2021-05-27
Relationships (1)
Judge Nathan denied Maxwell's bail applications.
Key Quotes (4)
"Judge Nathan did not clearly err or abuse her discretion when denying Maxwell’s prior bail applications."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020373.jpg
Quote #1
"The only changed circumstance... does nothing to alter the conclusion..."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020373.jpg
Quote #2
"Maxwell did not docket a new appeal from any order entered by Judge Nathan."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020373.jpg
Quote #3
"To the extent this motion is construed as one for panel reconsideration, it is untimely under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40(a)(1)..."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020373.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document