DOJ-OGR-00013283.jpg
584 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
584 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Attorneys discuss the potential recall of a witness named 'Jane' and whether she violated a sequestration order by communicating with her younger brother, who was also under subpoena. The Judge notes that while such communication is poor practice, no specific order barring witness communication had been entered.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Menninger | Attorney (Prosecution) |
Arguing that witness 'Jane' may have violated sequestration order by contacting her brother.
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Attorney (Defense) |
Arguing that the recall of witness 'Jane' should be limited to prior consistent statements.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the arguments; states no specific order was in place prohibiting witness communication.
|
| Jane | Witness |
Subject of potential recall; alleged to have contacted her brother.
|
| Jane's younger brother | Witness (Subpoenaed) |
Under subpoena; alleged to have been contacted by Jane.
|
| Brian | Unknown (likely witness or attorney) |
Mentioned in 'government withdraw Brian'.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Indicated by footer DOJ-OGR
|
|
| The Government |
Mentioned in relation to withdrawing 'Brian'.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-08-10
Filing of Document 755 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
Southern District Court
Unknown (Trial date)
Court hearing regarding witness recall and sequestration violations.
Courtroom
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in testimony regarding whether the brother entered it.
|
|
|
Implied by court reporter name.
|
Relationships (2)
Referred to as 'her younger brother'
Argues on behalf of the government/subpoena
Key Quotes (3)
"If she's had contact with her younger brother, who is under our subpoena, that might be fair game, your Honor. In my mind, she's violated the sequestration order."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013283.jpg
Quote #1
"I didn't enter one directing witnesses not to speak to each other. It is certainly not a good practice for reasons that have become apparent."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013283.jpg
Quote #2
"I hypothesized whether someone giving him a transcript of the proceeding would be, if not a violation of the letter, a violation of the spirit."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013283.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document