EFTA00027052.pdf
116 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email thread / legal correspondence
File Size:
116 KB
Summary
This document contains a chain of emails from October 15, 2020, discussing the technical details of document production and e-discovery for the case 'US v. Epstein'. The participants discuss refining search terms to identify 'junk' versus 'responsive' documents, specifically troubleshooting a keyword search that inadvertently captured responsive material. The conversation involves two distinct databases or search sets: 'US v. Epstein database' and 'US v. Epstein (SW)'.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Redacted Senders/Recipients | Legal/Technical Staff |
Participants in an email thread discussing e-discovery search terms and document production for US v. Epstein.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| US Government / DOJ |
Implied by the case name 'US v. Epstein' and the nature of the responsiveness review.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2020-10-15
Technical review of e-discovery search terms and responsiveness hits for the US v. Epstein case.
N/A
Redacted
Key Quotes (4)
"The search entitled 'Epstein — Junk Search Terms (Keywords)' seems to have caught up a number of documents that are not junk and appear responsive to the warrant."Source
EFTA00027052.pdf
Quote #1
"It's not clear to me why that happened—the ones I'm seeing don't appear to have any of the keywords on the attached list."Source
EFTA00027052.pdf
Quote #2
"I think we'd like to scrap this second search entirely. So please only keep the first search entitled 'Epstein — Junk Search Terms (From)' and tag those hits as junk."Source
EFTA00027052.pdf
Quote #3
"Those materials are ready stamp as set out in my prior email."Source
EFTA00027052.pdf
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document