DOJ-OGR-00010348.jpg
699 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing (opinion/order)
File Size:
699 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court order (Case 1:20-cr-00330, US v. Maxwell) filed on April 1, 2022. The Court rejects the Defendant's argument that 'Juror 50' was biased based on post-trial statements claiming the verdict was for the victims. The text discusses implied bias related to the juror's personal history of sexual abuse and references legal precedents regarding post-trial juror statements.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror 50 | Juror |
Accused by the defense of bias due to personal history of sexual abuse and post-trial statements.
|
| The Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) | Defendant |
Argues that Juror 50 was biased; convicted on five counts. (Identity confirmed by Case No 1:20-cr-00330 and reference...
|
| Stewart | Cited Legal Precedent |
Referenced in citation 'Stewart, 317 F. Supp. 2d' regarding juror bias arguments.
|
Relationships (1)
Juror 50 convicted the Defendant on five counts; Defendant alleges bias.
Key Quotes (4)
"The Court is unpersuaded by the Defendant’s arguments to the contrary."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010348.jpg
Quote #1
"Juror 50’s view of the Defendant after the thirteen-day trial... does not shed light on any bias he allegedly harbored 'before he heard the evidence presented.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00010348.jpg
Quote #2
"proclaim[ed] that the guilty verdict was for 'for all the victims.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00010348.jpg
Quote #3
"The Defendant’s central argument is that the Court should imply... that Juror 50 was biased against the Defendant."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010348.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document