DOJ-OGR-00003012.jpg
797 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing / legal memorandum (opposition to motion to dismiss)
File Size:
797 KB
Summary
This page is from a government legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to dismiss. The Government argues that Maxwell's claims of prejudice due to pre-indictment delay and media publicity since 2011 are speculative and insufficient to warrant dismissal. A footnote details a discovery dispute where the defense is requesting names, birth dates of minor victims, and specific details of overt acts.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the prosecution; arguing that pre-trial publicity and delay have prejudiced her case.
|
| The Government | Prosecution |
Arguing against the defendant's motion to dismiss charges.
|
| Minor Victims | Victims |
Mentioned in footnote regarding discovery disputes over their names and dates of birth.
|
| Trustee | Administrator |
Mentioned in relation to the potential destruction of records.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government |
The prosecution team (Department of Justice).
|
Timeline (3 events)
1996-2011
Timeframe during which the defendant claims the Government should have brought charges.
N/A
2011-Present
Period of alleged prejudicial media reporting and inappropriate pre-trial publicity.
N/A
Ms. Maxwell
Media
Relationships (1)
Government opposing Maxwell's motion to dismiss charges.
Key Quotes (4)
"The fact that evidence may be lost or destroyed during the pre-indictment stage is inherent in any delay, no matter what the duration."Source
DOJ-OGR-00003012.jpg
Quote #1
"She claims that had the Government brought charges against her between 1996 and 2011, the Government “would have not prevailed,” noting that the defendant’s accusers would not have been “able to conform their ‘memories’ to the often republished ‘obvious lies.’”"Source
DOJ-OGR-00003012.jpg
Quote #2
"In short, the defendant’s complaints are nothing more than the type of self-serving, vague, speculative, and conclusory claims of prejudice..."Source
DOJ-OGR-00003012.jpg
Quote #3
"Among the items the defense complains about not receiving in discovery are the names and dates of birth of the Minor Victims..."Source
DOJ-OGR-00003012.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document