DOJ-OGR-00002363.jpg
657 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / motion argument
File Size:
657 KB
Summary
This document is page 16 of a legal filing (Document 134) in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on February 4, 2021. The text presents a legal argument requesting the suppression of evidence obtained from a redacted source (likely civil depositions) and the dismissal of Counts Five and Six. The argument focuses on the sanctity of protective orders in civil litigation, asserting that the depositions intrusively probed Maxwell's sexual practices, preferences, and partners in what began as a defamation case.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant / Deponent |
Subject of the depositions discussed; the motion argues to suppress evidence regarding her personal life and sexual p...
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court |
Implied by case number format and 'S.D.N.Y.' citation
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR-00002363'
|
|
| Second Circuit Court of Appeals |
Cited in legal precedents
|
Timeline (1 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Cited in case law
|
Relationships (1)
Motion seeks to suppress evidence obtained by the government (implied) for criminal investigatory purposes.
Key Quotes (3)
"The Maxwell depositions sought highly intrusive evidence of the most personal aspects of Maxwell’s life. Her sexual practices. Her sexual preferences. Her sexual partners."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002363.jpg
Quote #1
"Pursuant To Its Inherent Power, This Court Should Suppress The Evidence Obtained From [REDACTED], And Dismiss Counts Five And Six, Which Are The Fruits Of That Evidence"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002363.jpg
Quote #2
"In urging the district court to permit these extraordinary intrusions—in what should have been a simple defamation case—"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002363.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document