DOJ-OGR-00009823.jpg
767 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing (government response/brief)
File Size:
767 KB
Summary
This page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) argues against a defense motion claiming Juror 50 was biased. The Government asserts that Juror 50's post-trial statements and negative attitude toward the defendant reflect the evidence presented during the trial, not pre-existing bias. It cites legal precedents including *United States v. Stewart* to support the argument that jurors bring subjective lived experiences to deliberations.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Annie Farmer | Victim/Witness |
Mentioned regarding a Twitter post and as a credible victim.
|
| Juror 50 | Juror |
Subject of defense claims regarding bias and impartiality based on media statements.
|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Implied Ghislaine Maxwell (based on Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE); described by Government as a predator.
|
| Martha Stewart | Defendant (Case Law) |
Referenced in cited case law regarding juror bias.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government |
Argued the defendant was a predator.
|
|
| S.D.N.Y. |
Southern District of New York.
|
|
| 2d Cir. |
Second Circuit Court of Appeals.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated by footer stamp).
|
Timeline (1 events)
Relationships (2)
Juror 50 determined guilt in defendant's trial.
Named as a victim whom the jury found credible.
Key Quotes (4)
"Juror 50’s attitudes towards the defendant and the victims after he heard compelling evidence of the defendant’s guilt... says nothing about the relevant inquiry here: whether he was biased 'before he heard the evidence presented.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009823.jpg
Quote #1
"We cannot expunge from jury deliberations the subjective opinions of jurors, their attitudinal expositions, or their philosophies."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009823.jpg
Quote #2
"the defendant was in fact a predator and that the victims, including Farmer, were credible."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009823.jpg
Quote #3
"Juror 50’s public statements about deliberations in fact demonstrate that he (and the jury more generally) was impartial."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009823.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document