DOJ-OGR-00011722.jpg

638 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 638 KB
Summary

A transcript page from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues to the Judge that they should be allowed to suggest witnesses were manipulated by civil attorneys, citing a witness named 'Carolyn' whose detailed 2008 legal filings and depositions did not mention Ms. Maxwell, implying her involvement was fabricated later. The Court overrules the objection to this line of argumentation at the opening stage but asks for evidence that attorneys explicitly told witnesses what to say.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Ms. Sternheim Attorney
Mentioned in the header 'Opening - Ms. Sternheim', likely delivering the opening statement discussed.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the argument, ruling on an objection regarding the opening statement.
Mr. Pagliuca Defense Attorney
Arguing that witnesses changed their stories to include Ghislaine Maxwell.
Carolyn Witness/Accuser
Cited as an example of a witness whose 2008 testimony/complaints did not originally include Ms. Maxwell.
Ms. Maxwell Defendant
Ghislaine Maxwell; the subject of the trial and the person allegedly added to witness stories later.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Court reporting agency listed in the footer.
The Government
Refers to the prosecution.

Timeline (2 events)

2008
Carolyn's answers to interrogatories, deposition testimony, and filing of a 91-page complaint.
Unknown
2022-08-10
Court filing date of the transcript document.
Courtroom

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied jurisdiction based on the court reporter's name (SDNY).

Relationships (2)

Mr. Pagliuca Legal Representation Ms. Maxwell
Mr. Pagliuca is arguing on behalf of the defense to discredit witnesses against Ms. Maxwell.
Carolyn Accuser/Accused Ms. Maxwell
Carolyn is a witness whose prior testimony is being scrutinized for not originally including Ms. Maxwell.

Key Quotes (4)

"That certainly couldn't be a good-faith basis to suggest to this jury that there will be evidence... that these were more manipulated by their attorneys who cultivated their specific stories told to the government."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00011722.jpg
Quote #1
"I'm going to overrule it at the opening stage."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00011722.jpg
Quote #2
"What evidence are you going to put in that shows the attorneys told the witnesses what to say?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00011722.jpg
Quote #3
"We have in 2008 -- I'll use Carolyn as the example -- answers to interrogatories that are detailed that do not include Ms. Maxwell; deposition testimony that is detailed but does not include Ms. Maxwell"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00011722.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document