DOJ-OGR-00021774.jpg

660 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal brief / appellate court filing
File Size: 660 KB
Summary

This page from a legal appeal (Case 22-1426) argues that the District Court erred in sentencing Ghislaine Maxwell by applying a leadership enhancement. The defense contends there is no evidence Maxwell supervised Sarah Kellen, noting that the Government chose not to indict Kellen and that pilots testified they did not know who Kellen worked for. The document requests that Maxwell be resentenced.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant/Appellant
Subject of sentencing appeal; arguing against leadership enhancement and requesting a new trial/resentencing.
Sarah Kellen Alleged Co-conspirator
Described as someone the Government claimed was a criminal participant but chose not to indict; the defense argues Ma...
Two pilots Witnesses
Testified at trial; testimony cited to show they did not know who Kellen worked for.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
The District Court
The lower court that sentenced Maxwell, alleged to have erred.
The Government
Prosecution; defending the court's sentencing decision.
Department of Justice
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR.

Timeline (2 events)

2023-07-27
Filing of Document 87 in Case 22-1426
Appellate Court
Unknown (Trial)
Testimony of two pilots regarding Sarah Kellen's employment
District Court

Relationships (2)

Ghislaine Maxwell Professional/Criminal Hierarchy (Disputed) Sarah Kellen
Brief argues there is no evidence Maxwell supervised Kellen, despite the lower court's finding.
Government claimed Kellen was a criminal participant but chose not to indict her.

Key Quotes (5)

"The Court abused its discretion in not granting Ms. Maxwell a new trial."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021774.jpg
Quote #1
"THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN SENTENCING MS. MAXWELL"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021774.jpg
Quote #2
"Specifically, the court’s finding that Ms. Maxwell supervised Sarah Kellen, who the Government claimed was a criminal participant but chose not to indict, is unsupported by the record."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021774.jpg
Quote #3
"The Government at sentencing correctly conceded that there was no direct evidence that Maxwell supervised Kellen."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021774.jpg
Quote #4
"The two pilots did not know who Kellen worked for and waffled in their testimony."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021774.jpg
Quote #5

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document