DOJ-OGR-00009325.jpg
427 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
427 KB
Summary
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on February 24, 2022. The witness, Ms. Brune (a defense attorney), is being questioned about her failure to inform the Court during jury selection that a Google search revealed a prospective juror (or person with a similar name), Catherine Conrad, was a suspended lawyer. Brune admits she did not ask for further research or alert the Court at that time.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brune | Witness / Attorney |
Being questioned about actions taken during jury selection (voir dire).
|
| Catherine Conrad | Subject of inquiry |
A suspended lawyer whose name appeared in a Google search during jury selection.
|
| The Court | Judge / Legal Authority |
The entity to whom Brune could have disclosed information.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Footer information.
|
|
|
Source of information regarding Catherine Conrad.
|
||
| DOJ |
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR.
|
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the court reporter's name (likely SDNY).
|
|
|
Described by witness as a 'big metropolitan area'.
|
Relationships (1)
Brune admits to seeing Google search results about a suspended lawyer named Catherine Conrad during jury selection.
Key Quotes (3)
"I certainly could have said to the Court that there is a Google search out there that reveals that there's a suspended lawyer by the name of Catherine Conrad."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009325.jpg
Quote #1
"If it's the same person, it's very significant information."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009325.jpg
Quote #2
"I did not ask anyone to do any further research."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009325.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document