DOJ-OGR-00021867.jpg
689 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal opinion / appellate court decision
File Size:
689 KB
Summary
This page is from a legal opinion (likely the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, given the citations) affirming a District Court's denial of Ghislaine Maxwell's motion. Maxwell argued that testimony regarding sexual abuse in New Mexico constituted a 'constructive amendment' or 'prejudicial variance' from the original indictment, violating the Fifth Amendment. The court reviews the denial *de novo* and rejects Maxwell's argument.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | Defendant/Appellant |
Ghislaine Maxwell; appealing a District Court denial regarding constructive amendment arguments.
|
| Jane | Victim/Witness |
Mentioned in a quoted segment regarding intent to engage in sexual activity.
|
| Witness | Witness |
Unnamed witness whose testimony regarding sexual abuse in New Mexico is the subject of the appeal argument.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| District Court |
The lower court whose denial Maxwell is appealing.
|
|
| Grand Jury |
Referenced in the context of the Fifth Amendment Clause.
|
|
| 2d Cir. |
Second Circuit Court of Appeals (referenced in footnotes).
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
Timeline (3 events)
Unknown (Prior)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where a witness's sexual abuse occurred, which Maxwell argued was distinct from the indictment charges.
|
|
|
Referenced in relation to criminal offense laws.
|
Key Quotes (3)
"Maxwell argues that testimony about a witness’s sexual abuse in New Mexico presented the jury with another basis for conviction, which is distinct from the charges in the Indictment."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021867.jpg
Quote #1
"We disagree and affirm the District Court’s denial."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021867.jpg
Quote #2
"intent that Jane engage in sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense in violation of New York law."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021867.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document