DOJ-OGR-00009894.jpg
656 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing / legal motion (page from defense brief)
File Size:
656 KB
Summary
This document is page 25 of a defense filing (Document 644) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated March 11, 2022. The text argues against a proposed hearing format regarding 'Juror No. 50's' alleged misconduct, citing legal precedent (*Dyer v. Calderon*) to claim that the Court cannot act as investigator, witness, and decision-maker simultaneously without violating due process. The defense questions how the Court intends to uncover Juror No. 50's motives and social media posts without independent investigation.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror No. 50 | Juror |
Subject of a bias inquiry regarding potential misconduct, misstatements, and undisclosed posts about the trial.
|
| Judge Kozinski | Judge |
Cited judge from the precedent case Dyer v. Calderon regarding juror bias inquiries.
|
| The Court | Judicial Body |
The presiding judge in the current case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), who the defense argues should not act as witness, inquis...
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 9th Cir. |
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, cited as legal precedent.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in footer stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
|
| The Government |
Prosecution team, referenced as citing Dyer v. Calderon favorably.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Relationships (1)
Court previously questioned Juror No. 50 through questionnaire and in person.
Key Quotes (4)
"At any hearing it is the Court’s job to evaluate the evidence presented, not present the evidence."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009894.jpg
Quote #1
"Where juror misconduct or bias is credibly alleged, the trial judge cannot wait for defense counsel to spoon feed him every bit of information which would make out a case of juror bias"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009894.jpg
Quote #2
"under the government’s farcical hearing the Court would be a (1) witness, (2) inquisitor, (3) factfinder and (4) sole decision maker."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009894.jpg
Quote #3
"These multiple, conflicted, roles are no model of due process."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009894.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document