DOJ-OGR-00008985.jpg
683 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing / legal memorandum (motion to intervene)
File Size:
683 KB
Summary
This document is page 6 of a legal filing (Document 609) from February 24, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It argues for Juror 50's right to intervene in the action to obtain a copy of his Jury Questionnaire under seal and asserts his right to privacy regarding his history as a sexual assault survivor. The text references an inquiry initiated by Judge Nathan regarding Juror 50's conduct and potential non-disclosure during jury selection, heightened by intense media scrutiny.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror 50 | Juror / Movant |
Seeking to intervene in the action, obtain his jury questionnaire, and maintain privacy regarding prior sexual assaul...
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Issued an order inviting Juror 50 to address the appropriateness of an inquiry into his conduct.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court |
The entity presiding over the case (SDNY).
|
|
| Prosecution |
Mentioned as a recipient for the Jury Questionnaire.
|
|
| Defense Counsel |
Mentioned as a recipient for the Jury Questionnaire.
|
|
| DOJ |
Implied by footer stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Relationships (2)
Judge Nathan issued an order inviting Juror 50 to address an inquiry.
Document mentions 'statements that he has made to the media about his jury service.'
Key Quotes (3)
"Juror 50 further desires to maintain his privacy and, to the extent possible, avoid having to disclose intimate details of his experience as the victim of prior sexual assault."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008985.jpg
Quote #1
"The relevant precedent from case law makes it abundantly clear that jurors have compelling and legitimate rights to privacy regarding 'intensely personal subjects,' including prior sexual assaults."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008985.jpg
Quote #2
"Judge Nathan specifically invited Juror 50 to address the 'appropriateness of an inquiry' into his conduct as a juror and affect that his personal history may have had on juror deliberations and the verdict rendered in this matter."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008985.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document