DOJ-OGR-00013027.jpg

594 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 594 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument between prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach and defense attorney Ms. Menninger regarding the upcoming testimony of a witness named Mr. Flatley. The dispute centers on whether Flatley's testimony regarding file dates on CDs constitutes expert opinion or purely factual testimony based on '3500 material'.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Mr. Rohrbach Attorney (Government)
Speaking to the court regarding the scope of Mr. Flatley's testimony and responding to defense letters.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the hearing, instructing counsel to get to the point.
Ms. Menninger Attorney (Defense)
Raising objections regarding the technical nature of Mr. Flatley's testimony about CDs.
Mr. Flatley Witness
Expected to give fact testimony regarding CDs, specifically about created vs. modified dates on files.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Listed in the footer.
Government
Referenced as submitting the November 26 letter.

Timeline (2 events)

2022-08-10
Filing date of the transcript document.
Court
Unknown
Court hearing regarding admissibility of testimony.
Courtroom

Locations (1)

Location Context
Jurisdiction indicated by the court reporters' name (SDNY).

Relationships (2)

Mr. Rohrbach Prosecutor/Witness Mr. Flatley
Rohrbach discusses what questions the government expects to ask Flatley.
Ms. Menninger Opposing Counsel/Witness Mr. Flatley
Menninger is raising issues regarding the content of Flatley's upcoming testimony.

Key Quotes (3)

"Every letter I get, it starts with, We're so surprised or this has already been litigated. Let's just get to the issue."
Source
— The Court (Expressing frustration with the formulaic nature of the legal correspondence.)
DOJ-OGR-00013027.jpg
Quote #1
"Mr. Flatley intends to testify that a created date is the same thing as a modified date."
Source
— Ms. Menninger (Describing the specific technical testimony the defense is concerned about.)
DOJ-OGR-00013027.jpg
Quote #2
"I think that we expect Mr. Flatley to give purely fact testimony regarding CDs, and there's no expert opinion at all involved there."
Source
— Mr. Rohrbach (Arguing that the witness is a fact witness, not an expert witness.)
DOJ-OGR-00013027.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document