DOJ-OGR-00004871.jpg

750 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

6
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
0
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing / court opinion attachment
File Size: 750 KB
Summary

This page is an excerpt from a legal document filed on July 2, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The text appears to be from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion in *Commonwealth v. Cosby* (indicated by docket [J-100-2020]), which was used by Maxwell's defense to argue about the enforceability of non-prosecution agreements. The text discusses the scope of prosecutorial discretion versus a defendant's due process rights and fundamental fairness, specifically when a defendant relies on a prosecutor's actions to their detriment.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Clancy Legal Citation
Cited case law regarding prosecutor discretion (192 A.3d at 53).
Stipetich Legal Citation
Cited case law regarding district attorney discretion (652 A.2d at 1295).
Santobello Legal Citation
Cited case law regarding due process.
Baird Legal Citation
Cited case law regarding due process.
Scotland Legal Citation
Cited case law regarding due process.
Sims Legal Citation
Referenced in Commonwealth v. Sims regarding federal and state due process principles.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
United States Constitution
Referenced regarding the Fourteenth Amendment.
Pennsylvania Constitution
Referenced regarding Article I, Section 9.
DOJ
Department of Justice, indicated in footer stamp DOJ-OGR.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned in relation to its Constitution and case law.

Key Quotes (3)

"The prosecutor enjoys 'tremendous' discretion to wield 'the power to decide whether to initiate formal criminal proceedings...'"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00004871.jpg
Quote #1
"While the prosecutor’s discretion in charging decisions is undoubtedly vast, it is not exempt from basic principles of fundamental fairness, nor can it be wielded in a manner that violates a defendant’s rights."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00004871.jpg
Quote #2
"The foregoing precedents make clear that, at a minimum, when a defendant relies to his or her detriment upon the acts of a prosecutor, his or her due process rights are implicated."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00004871.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document