DOJ-OGR-00019500.jpg
768 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal correspondence / court filing (letter motion)
File Size:
768 KB
Summary
This is page 3 of a legal filing (Document 28) dated July 27, 2020, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues for a specific provision in a protective order regarding victim/witness identities. Maxwell's defense contends that they should be permitted to reference alleged victims who have already voluntarily disclosed their identities in public records or media, arguing that the government's proposed restrictions are overly broad and hinder the defense's ability to investigate and advocate.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Addressee of the letter/filing.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the criminal case and the proposed protective order.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Deceased / Co-conspirator |
Referenced regarding previous criminal prosecution and litigation.
|
| Defense Counsel | Attorneys |
Lawyers representing Maxwell, arguing for specific terms in the protective order.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government |
Prosecution/DOJ opposing the defense's proposed language.
|
|
| S.D.N.Y. |
Southern District of New York (Court jurisdiction).
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by footer DOJ-OGR).
|
Timeline (2 events)
2019-07-25
2020-07-27
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction cited for the United States v. Epstein case.
|
Relationships (2)
Document references litigation relating to 'Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell' and compares their legal proceedings.
Judge Nathan is presiding over Maxwell's case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN).
Key Quotes (3)
"Ms. Maxwell’s proposed protective order... does not prohibit defense counsel from publicly referencing individuals 'who have spoken on the public record to the media or in public fora...'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00019500.jpg
Quote #1
"The government’s proposed restriction is therefore 'broader than necessary' to protect the privacy interests of these individuals who have already chosen to self-identify"Source
DOJ-OGR-00019500.jpg
Quote #2
"this language... is nearly identical in all material respects to the language in the protective order approved in the government’s criminal prosecution of Mr. Epstein"Source
DOJ-OGR-00019500.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document