DOJ-OGR-00009572.jpg
698 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / court document (government response or brief)
File Size:
698 KB
Summary
This document is page 10 of a legal filing (Document 621) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on February 25, 2022. It discusses the Court's jury instructions regarding the Mann Act, specifically focusing on whether the defendant intended for victims (referred to as 'Jane,' 'Kate,' and 'Annie') to engage in sexual activity in New York in violation of New York Penal Law Section 130.55. The text argues that the Court properly defined the scope of the alleged crimes and limited the jury's consideration to specific state offenses.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Subject of the trial and jury instructions (Ghislaine Maxwell, based on Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE)
|
| Jane | Victim (Pseudonym) |
Subject of substantive counts of enticement and transportation for sexual activity
|
| Kate | Witness/Victim (Pseudonym) |
Mentioned in trial transcript citation (Tr. 1167-68)
|
| Annie | Witness/Victim (Pseudonym) |
Mentioned in trial transcript citation (Tr. 2048-49)
|
| The Court | Judicial Authority |
Issued jury instructions and rulings
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Second Circuit |
Referenced in case citation regarding constructive amendment
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by footer DOJ-OGR)
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where sexual activity was intended to occur; jurisdiction of Penal Law
|
Relationships (3)
Defendant accused of enticing/transporting Jane for sexual activity
Trial transcript citation referencing Kate during defense requests
Trial transcript citation referencing Annie during defense requests
Key Quotes (3)
"the defendant ‘enticed Jane to travel across state lines with the intent that she would engage in sexual activity for which a person could be charged with a crime under the penal law of New York State.’"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009572.jpg
Quote #1
"For both Counts, the Court specifically instructed the jury on one and only one predicate state offense: a violation of New York Penal Law Section 130.55."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009572.jpg
Quote #2
"the defendant knowingly transported Jane ‘with the intent that Jane engage in sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense in violation of New York law.’"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009572.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document