DOJ-OGR-00001378.jpg

672 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal brief / appellate filing (page 6 of 30)
File Size: 672 KB
Summary

This is page 6 of a legal brief filed on April 19, 2021, in Case 21-770 (United States v. Maxwell). The text argues that the lower court failed to ensure the reliability of the government's evidence during bail hearings, citing legal precedents *LaFontaine* and *Martir*. The defense contends that unlike the *Martir* case, Ms. Maxwell actively challenged the government's 'flimsy proffer' through multiple hearings, but the court accepted the government's claims 'blindly' and 'uncritically.'

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ms. Maxwell Defendant / Appellant
The document argues that, unlike the defendant in the Martir case, Maxwell challenged the government's evidence durin...
Martir Legal Precedent / Defendant in cited case
Referenced in case law (United States v. Martir) regarding bail hearing standards.
LaFontaine Legal Precedent / Defendant in cited case
Referenced in case law (United States v. LaFontaine) regarding the reliability of evidence in bail hearings.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
The Government
The opposing party whose 'flimsy proffer' was challenged by Maxwell.
District Court / Lower Court
Criticized in the brief for acting 'blindly, uncritically' and failing to put the Government to the test.
DOJ-OGR
Listed in the footer (Office of Government Information Services).

Timeline (2 events)

Unknown (Past)
Initial bail hearing
Court
Ms. Maxwell The Government District Court
Unknown (Past)
Three bail renewal hearings
Court

Relationships (1)

Ms. Maxwell Adversarial / Legal The Government
Ms. Maxwell absolutely challenged the flimsy proffer from the initial bail hearing

Key Quotes (4)

"Ms. Maxwell absolutely challenged the flimsy proffer from the initial bail hearing through three renewals."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001378.jpg
Quote #1
"Instead of properly putting the Government to the test, the court blindly, uncritically, and"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001378.jpg
Quote #2
"Sounds familiar."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001378.jpg
Quote #3
"It then criticized the government’s proffer as stating in “the most general and conclusory terms what it hoped to provide,” for failing to submit any “independent evidence, such as tapes, documents, or photographs,”"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001378.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document