DOJ-OGR-00021999.jpg
984 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing (government opposition to adjournment)
File Size:
984 KB
Summary
This document is page 2 of a government legal filing dated January 28, 2020, arguing against a defense request to adjourn the trial. The text references defendants 'Thomas' and 'Noel' (likely the guards on duty during Epstein's suicide), stating that the case revolves around a 'brief, fourteen-hour window' and is not complex enough to warrant a six-month delay. The government asserts it has already provided witness statements (3500 material) well in advance and notes that no search warrants were obtained nor did defendants make post-arrest statements.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Thomas | Defendant |
Likely Michael Thomas (Epstein guard); counsel intends to file a motion to dismiss the indictment.
|
| Noel | Defendant |
Likely Tova Noel (Epstein guard); counsel reviewing discovery to determine motions.
|
| Thomas's Counsel | Legal Defense |
Intends to file motion to dismiss.
|
| Noel's Counsel | Legal Defense |
Reviewing discovery.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Government |
Opposing the adjournment request.
|
|
| Second Circuit |
Cited for legal precedent.
|
|
| S.D.N.Y. |
Southern District of New York; cited in case law.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in footer stamp).
|
Key Quotes (3)
"The Government’s case-in-chief turns on a brief, fourteen-hour window for which the evidence is limited and now available to the defendants."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021999.jpg
Quote #1
"the Government did not obtain any search warrants as part of its investigation, nor did the defendants make post-arrest statements that the Government would seek to introduce into evidence."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021999.jpg
Quote #2
"Noel’s counsel, however, identifies no reason to believe such a review is likely to result in the identification of any potential pre-trial motions"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021999.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document