DOJ-OGR-00008328.jpg
585 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
585 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on December 10, 2021. It details a discussion between the prosecution (Ms. Moe), the defense (Mr. Pagliuca), and the Judge regarding the physical inspection of evidence that occurred on November 1st. The Judge instructs the government not to mention specific evidence with uncertain admissibility in their opening statement and transitions the proceedings to discuss the admissibility of co-conspirator statements.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Prosecutor/Government Attorney |
Confirming evidence availability and agreeing not to mention specific evidence in opening statements.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, ruling on admissibility, and issuing instructions regarding opening statements.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Responding to the judge regarding whether there are further issues before moving on.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| Government | ||
| Defense |
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction based on court reporter stamp (likely SDNY)
|
Relationships (1)
Moe represents the government/prosecution; Pagliuca speaks for the defense.
Key Quotes (4)
"We notified the defense in a letter that it was available for inspection."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008328.jpg
Quote #1
"I think, given the uncertainty as to admission, the government should not mention it in its opening."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008328.jpg
Quote #2
"So next is the admissibility of co-conspirator statements."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008328.jpg
Quote #3
"Based on the law, of course the government has to make the showing that's required during the course of the trial."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008328.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document