DOJ-OGR-00002286(1).jpg
756 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
5
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing (memorandum of law/motion)
File Size:
756 KB
Summary
This document is page 8 of a legal filing (Document 120) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on January 25, 2021. The text presents legal arguments and case citations regarding the severance of charges and 'joinder,' specifically arguing that perjury counts should not be joined with substantive crimes if they are not sufficiently connected physically, temporally, or transactionally. The document cites precedents such as *United States v. Rivera*, *Randazzo*, and *Potamitis* to support the argument that unrelated offenses should be tried separately.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| AJN | Judge |
Initials in case number 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (Alison J. Nathan)
|
| Rivera | Defendant in cited case |
United States v. Rivera (2008)
|
| Randazzo | Defendant in cited case |
United States v. Randazzo (1996)
|
| Martinez | Defendant in cited case |
United States v. Martinez (1993)
|
| Brown | Defendant in cited case |
United States v. Brown (2008)
|
| Potamitis | Defendant in cited case |
United States v. Potamitis (1984)
|
| Botti | Defendant in cited case |
United States v. Botti (2009)
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| DOJ |
Indicated in Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002286
|
|
| 2d Cir. |
Second Circuit Court of Appeals, frequently cited
|
|
| 1st Cir. |
First Circuit Court of Appeals, cited in Randazzo
|
|
| S.D.N.Y. |
Southern District of New York, cited in Martinez and Botti
|
|
| E.D. Pa. |
Eastern District of Pennsylvania, cited in Brown
|
Timeline (1 events)
2021-01-25
Document 120 filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
Court
Key Quotes (4)
"Offenses are 'connected' or part of a 'common scheme or plan' if the counts 'grow out of related transactions.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002286(1).jpg
Quote #1
"joinder is inappropriate when '[c]ommission of one of the offenses neither depended upon nor necessarily led to the commission of the other'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002286(1).jpg
Quote #2
"Similarly, offenses that are separated by time and location, and were allegedly committed under different circumstances, are not sufficiently connected to warrant joinder."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002286(1).jpg
Quote #3
"joinder is not appropriate when the perjury or false statement allegations do not relate to, or have only a speculative connection to, the other charges in the indictment."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002286(1).jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document