DOJ-OGR-00002212.jpg
663 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / court motion (defense argument for bail)
File Size:
663 KB
Summary
This document is page 6 of a defense motion filed on December 23, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that the government has conceded it lacks significant contemporaneous documentary evidence against Maxwell and is relying almost exclusively on the 25-year-old recollections of three unidentified accusers. The document distinguishes the evidence against Maxwell from that against Jeffrey Epstein, noting that existing documentary evidence pertains to him.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the bail motion; defense argues the case against her lacks documentary evidence.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Associate/Deceased |
Mentioned to distinguish evidence against him vs. evidence against Maxwell.
|
| Three accusers | Witnesses |
Unidentified individuals whose testimony forms the basis of the government's case.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government |
Opposing party in the legal case.
|
|
| The Court |
The body evaluating the bail motion.
|
|
| 8th Cir. |
Cited in legal precedent (1985 case).
|
Timeline (3 events)
2020-12-23
Approx. 1995 (25 years prior)
Initial bail hearing
Relationships (2)
Defense argues evidence pertains to Epstein, not Maxwell.
Case based on recollections of the three accusers.
Key Quotes (4)
"The Government Concedes that Its Case Relies Almost Exclusively on the Testimony of Three Witnesses"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002212.jpg
Quote #1
"it has virtually no documentary corroboration at all—and that its case against Ms. Maxwell is based almost exclusively on the recollections of the three accusers"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002212.jpg
Quote #2
"The few examples of documentary corroboration referenced by the government... pertain to Epstein, not Ms. Maxwell."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002212.jpg
Quote #3
"The legal standard required by the [Bail Reform] Act is one of reasonable assurances, not absolute guarantees."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002212.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document