DOJ-OGR-00011673.jpg

580 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 580 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a procedural argument between prosecutor Ms. Moe and defense attorney Mr. Everdell regarding whether defense counsel must provide the government with a binder of cross-examination materials before the cross-examination begins. The Court rules that if the defense does not provide the binder in advance, the binder will not be placed with the jury in advance.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ms. Moe Prosecutor/Government Attorney
Requesting to review binders before they are given to jurors.
Mr. Everdell Defense Counsel
Arguing against providing a full binder of cross-examination materials to the government before cross-examination beg...
The Court Judge
Presiding over the procedural dispute regarding exhibit binders.

Organizations (2)

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Court procedural hearing regarding the handling of exhibit binders for jurors and opposing counsel interaction regarding cross-examination materials.
Courtroom (Southern District)

Locations (1)

Location Context

Relationships (1)

Ms. Moe Opposing Counsel Mr. Everdell
Transcript dialogue showing adversarial positions on legal procedure.

Key Quotes (2)

"But we do not want to give them a whole binder of cross materials before the cross begins."
Source
— Mr. Everdell (Defense counsel explaining why they do not want to share their binder with the prosecution in advance.)
DOJ-OGR-00011673.jpg
Quote #1
"We just want to have chance to lay eyes on that binder in an abundance of caution."
Source
— Ms. Moe (Prosecution explaining why they want to review the defense's materials.)
DOJ-OGR-00011673.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document