DOJ-OGR-00013217.jpg
544 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
6
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
544 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, discussing inconsistencies in dates provided in testimony versus an indictment. Mr. Pagliuca and The Court discuss a witness's (likely Carolyn) direct testimony and cross-examination regarding the dates of alleged incidents, specifically contrasting July 2002, 2001, and 2002-2003/2004. The discussion focuses on impeachment based on these chronological discrepancies in the alleged events.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Speaker |
Participating in court discussion about inconsistencies in testimony and indictment dates.
|
| THE COURT | Speaker |
Presiding over the court discussion, asking clarifying questions.
|
| Carolyn | Subject/Witness (implied) |
Mentioned in the context of 'Carolyn - cross' and her testimony regarding dates of incidents.
|
| witness | Witness |
Testified to events alleged in the indictment.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. |
Court reporting agency
|
Timeline (6 events)
Relationships (3)
Engaging in a verbal exchange during court proceedings.
The document title mentions 'Carolyn - cross' and subsequent discussion refers to 'her' testimony and 'the witness'.
Witness testified to events alleged in the indictment.
Key Quotes (4)
"MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes, 33. The first inconsistency with the direct testimony is the date, July of 2002."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013217.jpg
Quote #1
"MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, the indictment says 2001. In her direct testimony she said 2001, and on the cross-examination, she admitted to 2002."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013217.jpg
Quote #2
"THE COURT: So you have to use a full sentence so I can track you. She said the first incident was in 2001."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013217.jpg
Quote #3
"MR. PAGLIUCA: This is chronological through this complaint. This complaint goes from -- 2002 is the beginning spot, and goes through 2003. So the entirety of the allegation is that these events occurred between 2002 and 2003, not 2001 and 2004."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013217.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document