DOJ-OGR-00009720.jpg
621 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / court motion (defense brief)
File Size:
621 KB
Summary
This document is page 28 of a legal filing (Document 642) dated March 11, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It argues that Maxwell was deprived of a fair trial due to juror misconduct, specifically highlighting that Juror No. 50 and a second anonymous juror disclosed their personal histories of sexual abuse during deliberations, which allegedly influenced the jury's discussions. The page references a New York Times article from January 5, 2022, and contains a significant redaction in the footnotes.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror No. 50 | Juror |
Revealed in interviews that he and another juror disclosed sexual assault history during deliberations.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Ghislaine Maxwell; the filing argues her right to a fair trial was deprived.
|
| Second Juror | Juror (Anonymous) |
Admitted to disclosing sexual abuse history during deliberations; requested anonymity.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| New York Times |
Published an article confirming Juror No. 50's statement on January 5.
|
|
| Daily Mail |
Referenced in footnote 8 URL.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
Timeline (2 events)
Relationships (1)
Both served on the jury and disclosed abuse history during deliberations.
Key Quotes (3)
"A second juror admits to disclosing during deliberations that they were a victim of sexual assault"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009720.jpg
Quote #1
"Juror No. 50’s misconduct deprived Ms. Maxwell of her constitutional right to a fair trial by an impartial jury."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009720.jpg
Quote #2
"“This juror, who requested anonymity, said that they, too, had discussed the experience during deliberations and that the revelation had appeared to help shape the jury’s discussions.”"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009720.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document