Trove
Sign In Get Started

DOJ-OGR-00018936.jpg

567 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 567 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Hesse. Attorney Ms. Moe and the Court discuss the admissibility of exhibits 1B, 3P, and 3X, debating hearsay objections and the criteria for the 'business records' exception. The Judge outlines the requirements for establishing a foundation for business records.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ms. Moe Attorney (likely Prosecutor)
Discussing admissibility of exhibits and responding to the Judge.
The Court Judge
Ruling on hearsay objections and explaining legal standards for business records.
Hesse Witness
Under direct examination (mentioned in header 'Hesse - direct').

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
DOJ
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Court proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell)
Southern District of New York
The Court Ms. Moe Hesse
View

Locations (1)

Location Context
Southern District of New York
Implied by court reporter name and case number format.

Relationships (1)

Ms. Moe → Legal Examination → Hesse
Header states 'Hesse - direct' while Ms. Moe is the attorney speaking regarding the witness's evidence.

Key Quotes (3)

"Just to be specific, there is not an objection to the ones that she personally took."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00018936.jpg
Quote #1
"The record was made at or near the time by or from information transmitted by someone with knowledge."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00018936.jpg
Quote #2
"Making your record was a regular practice of that activity."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00018936.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document