DOJ-OGR-00019665.jpg
661 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / appellate brief
File Size:
661 KB
Summary
This document is page 19 of a legal filing (Case 20-3061) dated October 8, 2020, likely an appellate brief filed by Ms. Maxwell's defense. It argues that Judge Preska (civil case) is evaluating unsealing documents without knowing critical facts obscured by a criminal protective order overseen by Judge Nathan. The defense contends that unless the order is modified to allow sharing information under seal, Maxwell's right to a fair trial by an impartial jury will be prejudiced by the release of deposition materials.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Judge Preska | Judge (Civil Case) |
Tasked with evaluating unsealing of civil case filings; described as being 'ignorant of the fact' due to redactions/p...
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge (Criminal Case) |
Issued orders regarding the criminal protective order; received arguments from the government regarding grand jury se...
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant/Appellee (Ghislaine Maxwell) |
Seeking permission to share information under seal; arguing that release of deposition material will prejudice her ri...
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The government |
Opposing modification of protective order; concerned with grand jury secrecy.
|
|
| Second Circuit Court of Appeals |
Implied by citation '2d Cir. 2019' (Brown v. Maxwell).
|
|
| DOJ-OGR |
Department of Justice Office of Government Information Services (indicated by Bates stamp).
|
Timeline (2 events)
Relationships (2)
Document discusses the interaction between Preska's civil case tasks and Nathan's criminal protective orders.
Discusses government's arguments regarding protective orders vs Maxwell's requests.
Key Quotes (4)
"Judge Preska is performing this task ignorant of the fact that [REDACTED]"Source
DOJ-OGR-00019665.jpg
Quote #1
"Unless the criminal protective order is modified, Judge Preska will remain in the dark, and she will never be given the opportunity to consider the circumstances in their totality."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019665.jpg
Quote #2
"Ms. Maxwell has never sought to make public material the criminal protective order shields from disclosure."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019665.jpg
Quote #3
"release of the deposition material by Judge Preska [REDACTED] will unfairly prejudice her right to a fair trial by an impartial jury."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019665.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document