DOJ-OGR-00009490.jpg
472 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript / legal exhibit
File Size:
472 KB
Summary
This document is page 71 of 117 from a court filing (Exhibit A-5914) in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on Feb 24, 2022. The content is a transcript from a different legal proceeding (likely a tax fraud case involving Deutsche Bank) where attorney Mr. Shechtman argues about 'ineffective assistance' and 'prejudice,' comparing the situations of a Mr. Parse and Mr. Brubaker. The text discusses bank records, backdating allegations, and the cross-examination of a government cooperator by the Kramer Levin firm.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Shechtman | Attorney |
Speaker arguing the case, discussing the 'prejudice prong' and defending a client.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding official acknowledging Shechtman's argument.
|
| Judge Easterbrook | Judge |
Cited by Shechtman regarding legal doctrines on waiver and ineffective assistance.
|
| Mr. Parse | Defendant/Subject |
Subject of the legal argument; compared to Mr. Brubaker.
|
| Mr. Brubaker | Subject |
Person compared to Mr. Parse regarding their legal situation and proof against them.
|
| Jenkins lawyer | Attorney |
Mentioned in relation to dealing with a government cooperator.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Kramer Levin firm |
Law firm mentioned as having cross-examined a government cooperator.
|
|
| Deutsche Bank |
Bank whose records are being discussed regarding backdating.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ (Department of Justice) |
Implied by the 'DOJ-OGR' stamp.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-02-24
Filing of the document in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell).
Court
February and March (Year unspecified)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
likely Southern District of New York, implied by court reporter stamp.
|
Relationships (2)
Mr. Parse is not situated that much differently than Mr. Brubaker
I think it is that that Judge Easterbrook had in mind
Key Quotes (4)
"Mr. Parse is not situated that much differently than Mr. Brubaker, and the proof as it came in didn't come in much differently."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009490.jpg
Quote #1
"What distinguishes these two men is the, quote, backdate."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009490.jpg
Quote #2
"I don't think that's what the Deutsche Bank records show."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009490.jpg
Quote #3
"They are doing these in February and March and putting them on February and March statements and they're putting 'as of.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009490.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document