DOJ-OGR-00005787.jpg

650 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court filing (memorandum in opposition to motions in limine)
File Size: 650 KB
Summary

This document is a Preliminary Statement from a Government memorandum filed on October 29, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Government argues against thirteen motions in limine filed by the defense, asserting the admissibility of expert testimony, evidence regarding Minor Victim-3 and Minor Victim-4, co-conspirator statements, and the use of the terms 'victim' and 'rape' during trial. The Government also notes it will not introduce evidence of the defendant's flight or false statements in its case-in-chief unless the defense opens the door.

People (4)

Name Role Context
The Defendant Defendant
Subject of the criminal case (Ghislaine Maxwell, based on case number 1:20-cr-00330-PAE); opposing the government's a...
Minor Victim-3 Victim/Witness
Evidence relating to this individual is argued to be admissible as direct evidence of charged crimes.
Minor Victim-4 Victim/Witness
Provided a confirmatory identification of the defendant which the government argues was not unduly suggestive.
Qualified Expert Expert Witness
Government witness intended to provide reliable and relevant opinions.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
The Government
Submitting the memorandum in opposition.
DOJ-OGR
Department of Justice - Office of Government Relations (indicated by footer stamp).

Timeline (2 events)

2021-10-29
Filing of Government's memorandum in opposition to defendant's motions in limine.
Federal Court (implied)
Future (Trial)
Anticipated trial where evidence regarding victims and terms like 'rape' will be used.
Court

Relationships (2)

The Defendant Alleged Victim/Perpetrator Minor Victim-3
Evidence relating to Minor Victim-3 is admissible as direct evidence of charged crimes.
The Defendant Alleged Victim/Perpetrator Minor Victim-4
Minor Victim-4 provided confirmatory identification of the defendant.

Key Quotes (5)

"The Government respectfully submits this memorandum in opposition to the defendant’s thirteen motions in limine"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00005787.jpg
Quote #1
"evidence relating to Minor Victim-3 is admissible both as direct evidence of the charged crimes, and admissible in the alternative under Rule 404(b)."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00005787.jpg
Quote #2
"Minor Victim-4’s confirmatory identification of the defendant was not unduly suggestive, and it should not be suppressed."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00005787.jpg
Quote #3
"it is entirely proper for the word “victim” and for discussion of rape to be used in a trial about the sexual exploitation of minor victims."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00005787.jpg
Quote #4
"the Government does not intend to offer evidence of the defendant’s flight, her false exculpatory statements, or law enforcement expert testimony in its case in chief, unless the defendant opens the door"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00005787.jpg
Quote #5

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document