DOJ-OGR-00008909.jpg
611 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order
File Size:
611 KB
Summary
This is a court order filed on February 11, 2022, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Judge denies the defendant's motion to seal all documents related to her motion for a new trial in their entirety, ruling that sealing must be narrowly tailored. The document also references a motion to intervene by 'Juror 50' and mentions that media organizations have requested the unsealing of documents.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | District Judge |
Judge issuing the order regarding sealing motions.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Defendant in the case; requested to seal motion for a new trial.
|
| Juror 50 | Juror |
Filed a motion to intervene; subject of privacy concerns.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of New York |
Venue of the legal proceedings.
|
|
| United States of America |
Government entity prosecuting the case.
|
|
| Media Organizations |
Filed letters seeking unsealing of documents.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the court.
|
Relationships (3)
Case caption: United States of America -v- Ghislaine Maxwell
Judge issuing order in Maxwell's case
Juror 50 filed motion to intervene; Maxwell opposes intervention
Key Quotes (4)
"Defendant’s motion to temporarily seal in their entirety all documents related to the motion for a new trial is DENIED."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008909.jpg
Quote #1
"Any sealing of judicial documents must be narrowly tailored to serve competing interests."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008909.jpg
Quote #2
"Protection of these interests, however, can plainly be accomplished through tailored redactions."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008909.jpg
Quote #3
"The Defendant seeks to strike or, in the alternative, seal Juror 50’s motion."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008909.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document