DOJ-OGR-00002219.jpg
730 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
4
Organizations
3
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing (legal memorandum)
File Size:
730 KB
Summary
This document is page 13 of a legal filing (Document 103) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on December 23, 2020. The text argues against the government's concerns regarding Maxwell's flight risk, utilizing expert opinions from Mr. Julié (French law) and David Perry (UK law) to assert that extradition from France or the UK would be legally permissible and likely, and that bail in the UK would be denied. It specifically refutes the relevance of a 2006 precedent where France refused extradition, arguing that international treaties prevail over French national legislation.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of extradition and bail arguments; citizen of US and France.
|
| Mr. Julié | Legal Expert (French Law) |
Provided a rebuttal report explaining French extradition law and the French Constitution.
|
| David Perry | Legal Expert (UK Extradition) |
Provided an opinion that Maxwell would be unlikely to resist extradition from the UK or receive bail there.
|
| Secretary of State | Government Official |
Mentioned in footnote regarding discretion to deny extradition.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MOJ |
Ministry of Justice (implied); issued a letter regarding French Code of Criminal Procedure.
|
|
| French Courts |
Judicial body that would rule on extradition requests.
|
|
| U.S. Court |
Judicial body setting bail conditions.
|
|
| United States Government |
Prosecution/Opposing party relying on a 2006 case precedent.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2006
Case where France refused to extradite a French national who was also a U.S. citizen.
France
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Country seeking potential extradition; location of court proceedings.
|
|
|
Country of potential refuge; discussion of its extradition laws.
|
|
|
Country of potential refuge; discussion of its extradition laws.
|
Relationships (2)
Mr. Julié provides expert opinion supporting Maxwell's legal arguments.
David Perry provides expert opinion regarding UK extradition supporting Maxwell's legal arguments.
Key Quotes (4)
"extradition of a French national to the United States is legally permissible if the extradition treaty between the United States and France provides for it"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002219.jpg
Quote #1
"it is 'highly unlikely' that an extradition decree would not be issued."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002219.jpg
Quote #2
"bail would be 'extremely unlikely.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002219.jpg
Quote #3
"waiver would be 'a highly relevant factor' in the U.K. proceeding"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002219.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document