DOJ-OGR-00010168.jpg

471 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
5
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal transcript / court proceeding record
File Size: 471 KB
Summary

This document is page 11 of a court transcript (filed March 24, 2022) discussing legal arguments regarding 'ineffective assistance' of counsel and 'waivers.' The speaker cites legal precedents including 'Chappee' in the First Circuit and 'Flores' in the Second Circuit, discussing the 'Rosario material' and '3500 material' (discovery rules) in the context of New York law and federal appeals.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Judge Van Graafeiland Judge
Mentioned as having written a dissent in the 'Flores' case cited by the speaker.
Flores Case Subject
Referenced in the case name 'Flores' in the Second Circuit.
Chappee Case Subject
Referenced in the case name 'Chappee' in the First Circuit.

Organizations (5)

Name Type Context
First Circuit
Federal court circuit mentioned in relation to the Chappee case.
Second Circuit
Federal court circuit mentioned in relation to the Flores case.
First Department in New York Court of Appeals
Legal body mentioned regarding waiver laws.
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Transcription service provider listed at the bottom of the page.
DOJ
Department of Justice (inferred from footer stamp DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (1 events)

03/24/22
Filing date of the document containing this transcript.
Unknown (Court Filing)

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned in the context of state law ('New York law') and the Court of Appeals.

Key Quotes (3)

"It's also under Chappee in the First Circuit, and I would bet it is also effective assistance."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010168.jpg
Quote #1
"There is no harmless error standard, that's how crazy New York law was."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010168.jpg
Quote #2
"How can a lawyer possibly having been handed a piece of paper which is a new trial card, how can you not play it."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010168.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document