DOJ-OGR-00010382.jpg
719 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order / legal opinion
File Size:
719 KB
Summary
This document is page 16 of a court order filed on April 29, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The page details the Court's denial of the Defendant's Rule 29 motion for a judgment of acquittal, citing various legal precedents regarding the sufficiency of evidence required to sustain a conviction. The text outlines the legal standard that evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the government.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Subject of the Rule 29 motion for acquittal (refers to Ghislaine Maxwell based on Case 1:20-cr-00330).
|
| The Court | Judicial Authority |
Entity denying the motion and making legal determinations.
|
| The jury | Fact Finder |
Made factual findings referenced in the text.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Justice |
Indicated by Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
|
| 2d Cir. |
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, cited in case law.
|
|
| Government |
The prosecution team in the case.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Relationships (1)
Reference to 'evidence against a particular defendant' and 'Government's case'.
Key Quotes (3)
"II. The Court denies the Defendant’s Rule 29 motion."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010382.jpg
Quote #1
"The Defendant argues there was insufficient evidence to support any of her five counts of conviction"Source
DOJ-OGR-00010382.jpg
Quote #2
"the relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010382.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document