DOJ-OGR-00009587.jpg
701 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / court motion
File Size:
701 KB
Summary
This document is page 25 of a legal filing (Document 621) from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 25, 2022. The Government argues that the Court should enter judgment on Count Three (Mann Act conspiracy) and Count Five (Sex Trafficking conspiracy under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act), asserting they are distinct criminal schemes and not multiplicitous. It also addresses procedural arguments regarding jury instructions related to a witness/victim referred to as 'Jane'.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane | Witness/Victim |
Testimony discussed regarding limiting instructions during trial.
|
| The defendant | Defendant |
Implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell based on case number 1:20-cr-00330; described as ignoring distinctions between counts.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court |
United States District Court (Judge Paul A. Engelmayer implied by initials PAE).
|
|
| The Government |
Prosecution (Department of Justice/US Attorney's Office).
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in footer stamp).
|
Timeline (2 events)
2021-04-16
Court Order holding Government was entitled to present three different counts to the jury.
Court Record
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction where the violation of law was charged and where intent to commit a criminal sexual act was required.
|
Relationships (1)
Government arguing for judgment on specific counts against the defendant.
Key Quotes (5)
"the violation of law is as charged in New York."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009587.jpg
Quote #1
"The Court, the Government, and the defense were painstaking during trial to ensure that the jury understood that the Mann Act counts required an intent to commit a criminal sexual act in New York."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009587.jpg
Quote #2
"The Court Should Enter Judgment on Counts Three and Five"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009587.jpg
Quote #3
"the Government submits that the Court should enter judgment on Count Three, which was predicated on 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a), and Count Five, which was predicated on 18 U.S.C. § 1591."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009587.jpg
Quote #4
"Counts Three and Five arose from different criminal schemes, involving different criminal conduct, different statutory predicates, and a different modus operandi."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009587.jpg
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document