DOJ-OGR-00005832.jpg
987 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing (legal brief/motion)
File Size:
987 KB
Summary
This document is page 49 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on October 29, 2021. It argues for the admissibility of 'Minor Victim-3's' testimony, stating it is necessary to counter expected defenses that the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) played no role in procuring girls for Jeffrey Epstein. Footnote 11 provides extensive legal analysis distinguishing this case from precedents (Cummings, Townsend, Mahaffy, Nektalov) regarding 'other crimes' evidence and Rule 404(b), arguing that the abuse of Minor Victim-3 is direct proof of the conspiracy rather than a distinct, unrelated crime.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Alleged Co-conspirator |
Mentioned in the context of the defendant obtaining girls to massage him.
|
| The Defendant | Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell implied by Case ID) |
Subject of the legal arguments regarding admissibility of evidence and expected defense strategies.
|
| Minor Victim-3 | Victim/Witness |
Her testimony is deemed necessary to complete the story of the offense conduct; abuse occurred during the charged con...
|
| Ferro | Person in cited case law |
referenced in a legal citation regarding 'other crimes' evidence.
|
| Romero-Padilla | Person in cited case law |
referenced in a legal citation regarding conspiracy and motivation.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court |
Implied by the filing header and S.D.N.Y. citations
|
|
| DOJ-OGR |
Department of Justice - Office of Government Relations (found in Bates stamp)
|
|
| S.D.N.Y. |
Southern District of New York (referenced in legal citations)
|
|
| 2d Cir. |
Second Circuit Court of Appeals (referenced in legal citations)
|
Timeline (1 events)
During the charged conspiracy period
Relationships (2)
Text mentions defense argument regarding defendant playing no role in obtaining girls to massage Epstein.
Text states Victim-3's abuse occurred during the charged conspiracy period and is direct proof of the conspiracy.
Key Quotes (3)
"Minor Victim-3’s testimony is also necessary to complete the story of the offense conduct in light of expected defenses at trial."Source
DOJ-OGR-00005832.jpg
Quote #1
"To the extent that the defense argues, for instance, that the defendant played no role in obtaining girls to massage Epstein or was unaware that Epstein’s"Source
DOJ-OGR-00005832.jpg
Quote #2
"That is not the case here, where the abuse of Minor Victim-3 occurred during the charged conspiracy period, overlaps temporally with the testimony of other Minor Victims... and is direct proof of the operation of the conspiracy."Source
DOJ-OGR-00005832.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document