DOJ-OGR-00009202.jpg
740 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Federal court filing (legal brief/motion reply)
File Size:
740 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a legal filing (Document 616) in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on February 24, 2022. It is a legal argument rebutting the government's opposition to a new trial, specifically addressing standards of juror misconduct, prejudice, and the right to an impartial jury. The text cites various legal precedents including Tanner v. United States and United States v. Ianniello to discuss the balance between investigating juror misconduct and maintaining verdict finality.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the legal argument regarding a new trial and requirements to show prejudice.
|
| The Court | Judiciary |
The entity being addressed regarding the standards for a new trial.
|
| The government | Prosecution |
The opposing party whose arguments are being rebutted.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Second Circuit |
Cited for legal precedent (United States v. Ianniello).
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice, indicated by the footer 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
Relationships (1)
The text describes the defense rebutting the government's arguments regarding new trial motions.
Key Quotes (4)
"Ms. Maxwell is not required to show prejudice, nor must the Court have “a real concern that an innocent person may have been convicted” before a new trial is required."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009202.jpg
Quote #1
"The government’s contrary contention is specious."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009202.jpg
Quote #2
"Allegations of juror misconduct, incompetency, or inattentiveness, raised for the first time . . . after the verdict, seriously disrupt the finality of the process."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009202.jpg
Quote #3
"[a]mong those basic fair trial rights that ‘can never be treated as harmless’ is a defendant’s ‘right to an impartial adjudicator, be it judge or jury.’"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009202.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document