DOJ-OGR-00011644.jpg
618 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
618 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated August 10, 2022) involving a legal debate over witness testimony. Ms. Menninger argues that the government did not provide sufficient notice regarding the scope of Mr. Flatley's testimony concerning the extraction of user data and metadata, claiming the '3500 material' was insufficient. Mr. Rohrbach responds that while they view Flatley primarily as a fact witness, they provided expert notice due to the blurred lines between fact and expert testimony in this technical context.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Menninger | Attorney |
Arguing regarding the scope of witness testimony and lack of notice in 3500 material.
|
| Mr. Flatley | Witness |
Subject of the debate; government witness described as primarily a fact witness but with potential expert testimony r...
|
| Mr. Kelso | Witness |
Mentioned as a point of comparison for expert testimony.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, asking clarification questions about Flatley's status.
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Attorney |
Representing the government, explaining the classification of Mr. Flatley as a witness.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in the footer.
|
|
| The Government |
Prosecution team, referred to by Ms. Menninger.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court hearing regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), specifically debating the testimony scope of Mr. Flatley.
Southern District of New York (Implied)
Relationships (2)
Rohrbach discusses how 'we' (the government) are using Flatley as a witness.
Menninger argues against the sufficiency of materials provided by the government.
Key Quotes (3)
"MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, the 3500 material doesn't say Mr. Flatley is going to describe the extraction of user data this way."Source
DOJ-OGR-00011644.jpg
Quote #1
"MR. ROHRBACH: We think Mr. Flatley is primarily a fact witness, but the line between a fact witness in a setting like this and someone testifying on the basis of their expertise is not well settled..."Source
DOJ-OGR-00011644.jpg
Quote #2
"THE COURT: But are you using Flatley as an expert?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00011644.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document