DOJ-OGR-00010039.jpg
454 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Deposition transcript / court filing
File Size:
454 KB
Summary
This is a page from a deposition transcript involving a witness named Ms. Brune (likely an attorney). She is being questioned about a discrepancy between facts presented in a July 21st letter and a legal brief, and a subsequent conference call with Judge Pauley on July 22nd where the Judge expressed unhappiness with the conflicting information. Brune expresses regret for 'missing' something in the brief.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Brune | Witness/Deponent |
Being questioned regarding legal briefs, letters, and interactions with the Court/Judge Pauley.
|
| Judge Pauley | Judge |
Presided over the conference call; described as 'not happy' with the legal team.
|
| Defense Counsel | Attorney |
Mentioned as being questioned by the Court regarding conflicting versions of facts.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| The Court |
Timeline (2 events)
July 22nd
Court convened a conference call regarding conflicting facts in defense filings.
Court (Teleconference)
Relationships (1)
Ms. Brune describes Judge Pauley's reaction on a conference call.
Key Quotes (3)
"I think we missed it. And it's something that I greatly regret, there is no question about that."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010039.jpg
Quote #1
"Judge Pauley... certainly was conveying that he wanted to get to the bottom of things and that he was not happy with us."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010039.jpg
Quote #2
"Indeed, the Court inquired of the defense counsel why he was getting two different versions of the facts, correct?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00010039.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document