DOJ-OGR-00009576.jpg
651 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing / legal brief (case 1:20-cr-00330-pae)
File Size:
651 KB
Summary
This document is page 14 of a court filing (Document 621) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on February 25, 2022. It discusses a specific jury note sent during deliberations regarding 'Count Four' and whether aiding in the return flight of a victim named 'Jane' (but not the flight to New Mexico) constituted guilt if the intent was sexual activity. The text details the defense's attempt to add jury instructions to limit the scope of intent to New York, which the Court rejected.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Defendant | Accused |
Referenced throughout regarding conviction arguments and jury notes (Refers to Ghislaine Maxwell based on Case No. 1:...
|
| Jane | Victim/Witness |
Subject of transportation to New Mexico and potential sexual activity
|
| The Court | Judicial Authority |
Judge presiding over the trial, issuing instructions, and ruling on defense requests
|
| The Jury | Fact Finder |
Deliberating body that sent a note regarding Count Four
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR)
|
|
| Defense Counsel |
Filed a letter seeking reconsideration of the Court's response
|
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where Jane was transported to, allegedly to engage in sexual activity
|
|
|
Mentioned in defense proposal regarding intent for sexual activity
|
Key Quotes (3)
"Under Count Four, if the defendant aided in the transportation of Jane’s return flight, but not the flight to New Mexico, where/if the intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity, can she be found guilty under the second element?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009576.jpg
Quote #1
"the jury note was otherwise 'too difficult to parse factually and legally.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009576.jpg
Quote #2
"[a]n intent that Jane engage in sexual activity in any state other than New York cannot form the basis of these two elements of Counts Two and Four."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009576.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document