DOJ-OGR-00008231.jpg
655 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing (defense letter/motion in limine)
File Size:
655 KB
Summary
This legal filing from December 5, 2021, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, argues for the exclusion of specific evidence in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense contends that 2019 photographs of Jeffrey Epstein's house are irrelevant and prejudicial because items like massage tables and artwork are 'highly mobile' and may not reflect the conditions present when the accuser, Jane, was there in 1994-1996. The document asserts that the photos are inflammatory and lack connection to Ms. Maxwell.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
The Honorable Judge addressed in the filing.
|
| Jane | Witness/Accuser |
Described being at Epstein's house in 1994-1996; provided descriptions of items.
|
| Mr. Epstein | Subject |
Owner of the house where the alleged events took place.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Mentioned in the argument that the photos have 'no connection to Ms. Maxwell'.
|
| McCormick | Legal Authority |
Author of 'McCormick on Evid.' cited regarding evidence rules.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The government |
Attempting to introduce photographic evidence.
|
|
| The Court |
Reviewing the admissibility of evidence.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2021-12-03
Court proceeding referenced in transcript citation (TR 12/3/2021).
Courtroom
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of alleged events in 1994-1996; subject of 2019 photographs.
|
|
|
Location where the government physically carried a massage table.
|
Relationships (2)
Text mentions 'Jane was at Mr. Epstein’s house' 25 years ago.
Implied by the context of the case and the defense arguing evidence has 'no connection to Ms. Maxwell'.
Key Quotes (4)
"Artwork is highly mobile. Furniture is highly mobile. Massage tables are highly mobile."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008231.jpg
Quote #1
"(The government carried one such table into the well of the courtroom.)"Source
DOJ-OGR-00008231.jpg
Quote #2
"Indeed, the government now disavows any argument 'that the particular nude artwork in the exhibits was present while Jane was abused.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00008231.jpg
Quote #3
"they are unfairly prejudicial because they depict something occurring fifteen years after the charged conspiracy, they have no connection to Ms. Maxwell, and they are inflammatory."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008231.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document