DOJ-OGR-00010294.jpg
884 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing (court order/brief)
File Size:
884 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on March 15, 2022. It argues against the defendant's motion for a new trial, specifically addressing allegations regarding 'Juror 50' and citing the 'McDonough' test for juror misconduct. The text asserts the defendant failed to prove the juror committed a deliberate falsehood during voir dire.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Referring to Ghislaine Maxwell (implied by Case 1:20-cr-00330), who is seeking a new trial.
|
| Juror 50 | Juror |
The subject of the dispute; accused by the defense of making misrepresentations during voir dire.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Second Circuit |
Cited for binding legal precedents (United States v. Shaoul).
|
|
| The Government |
Opposing the defense motion for a new trial.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice, indicated by the Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
Relationships (1)
Defendant is seeking a new trial based on alleged misrepresentations by Juror 50.
Key Quotes (4)
"The defendant has not come close to establishing that the extraordinary remedy of a new trial is warranted."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010294.jpg
Quote #1
"A party must first demonstrate that a juror failed to answer honestly a material question on voir dire..."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010294.jpg
Quote #2
"There is no evidence in the record that Juror 50"Source
DOJ-OGR-00010294.jpg
Quote #3
"The Court should reject this invitation."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010294.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document