DOJ-OGR-00011647.jpg

578 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 578 KB
Summary

This document is page 26 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It details a legal argument between prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach and the Judge regarding Rule 16 disclosures and the sufficiency of notice provided to the defense concerning the opinions of expert witness Mr. Flatley. The Judge warns the government that if their notice is insufficient, they may face issues later, emphasizing equal standards for both parties.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Mr. Rohrbach Government Attorney/Prosecutor
Arguing on behalf of the government regarding disclosure of expert opinions.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the hearing, issuing instructions regarding Rule 16 and expert notice.
Mr. Flatley Expert Witness
Subject of the discussion; the government is providing notice of his opinions.
Ms. Menninger Defense Attorney
Mentioned by Rohrbach regarding her strategy for her expert's review of Flatley's testimony.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
The Government
Prosecution team.
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Court reporting agency listed in the footer.
DOJ
Department of Justice (implied by Bates stamp prefix).

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Court hearing regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell context implied by case number/names). Discussion focuses on expert witness disclosure rules.
Courtroom (Southern District)

Locations (1)

Location Context
Likely SDNY based on 'Southern District Reporters' and case number format.

Relationships (3)

Mr. Rohrbach Representative The Government
Mr. Rohrbach speaks on behalf of 'The government'.
Ms. Menninger Representative The Defense
Context implies she represents the defense team opposing Rohrbach.
Mr. Flatley Witness The Government
Government is providing notice of his opinions/testimony.

Key Quotes (3)

"If your notice is insufficient under Rule 16 to tell us now what opinions your expert is going to provide, then you may have problems down the road."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00011647.jpg
Quote #1
"The government believes that its notice, in combination with its 3500 materials... should give the defense an understanding of Mr. Flatley's opinions."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00011647.jpg
Quote #2
"I'm not going to have them held to a different standard than what the government has done here."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00011647.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document